| 1 |
/* svPMC: Stochastic Volatility Inference via Population Monte Carlo |
|---|
| 2 |
|
|---|
| 3 |
Copyright (C) 2007-2008 by Edwin A. Suominen, http://www.eepatents.com |
|---|
| 4 |
|
|---|
| 5 |
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under |
|---|
| 6 |
the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software |
|---|
| 7 |
Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later |
|---|
| 8 |
version. |
|---|
| 9 |
|
|---|
| 10 |
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT |
|---|
| 11 |
ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS |
|---|
| 12 |
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the file COPYING for more details. |
|---|
| 13 |
|
|---|
| 14 |
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with |
|---|
| 15 |
this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 |
|---|
| 16 |
Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA |
|---|
| 17 |
|
|---|
| 18 |
*/ |
|---|
| 19 |
|
|---|
| 20 |
|
|---|
| 21 |
// VAR.reverse |
|---|
| 22 |
// |
|---|
| 23 |
// Supplied variables |
|---|
| 24 |
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 25 |
// v Innovation values (initially empty), [pn] array |
|---|
| 26 |
// y Observation values, [pn] array |
|---|
| 27 |
// a Drift, [p] vector |
|---|
| 28 |
// b Lag-1 cross-correlation [pp] array |
|---|
| 29 |
|
|---|
| 30 |
int i, j, k; |
|---|
| 31 |
double sum; |
|---|
| 32 |
|
|---|
| 33 |
// The first innovation for each time series is just the first observation |
|---|
| 34 |
// minus the drift |
|---|
| 35 |
for(i=0; i<Ny[0]; i++) |
|---|
| 36 |
V2(i,0) = Y2(i,0) - A1(i); |
|---|
| 37 |
// For each observation after the first... |
|---|
| 38 |
for(j=1; j<Ny[1]; j++) { |
|---|
| 39 |
// For each time series... |
|---|
| 40 |
for(i=0; i<Ny[0]; i++) { |
|---|
| 41 |
// The current observation minus the drift... |
|---|
| 42 |
sum = Y2(i,j) - A1(i); |
|---|
| 43 |
// ...minus the dot product for the VAR(1) term... |
|---|
| 44 |
for(k=0; k<Ny[0]; k++) |
|---|
| 45 |
sum -= B2(i,k) * Y2(k,j-1); |
|---|
| 46 |
// ...is the innovation that yielded this observation |
|---|
| 47 |
V2(i,j) = sum; |
|---|
| 48 |
} |
|---|
| 49 |
} |
|---|
| 50 |
|
|---|
| 51 |
|
|---|
| 52 |
|
|---|
| 53 |
// VAR.forward |
|---|
| 54 |
// |
|---|
| 55 |
// Supplied variables |
|---|
| 56 |
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 57 |
// y Modeled values (initially empty), [pn] array |
|---|
| 58 |
// v Innovation values, [pn] array |
|---|
| 59 |
// a Drift, [p] vector |
|---|
| 60 |
// b Lag-1 cross-correlation [pp] array |
|---|
| 61 |
|
|---|
| 62 |
int i, j, k; |
|---|
| 63 |
double sum; |
|---|
| 64 |
|
|---|
| 65 |
// The first modeled value for each time series is just the first innovation |
|---|
| 66 |
// plus the drift |
|---|
| 67 |
for(i=0; i<Nv[0]; i++) |
|---|
| 68 |
Y2(i,0) = V2(i,0) + A1(i); |
|---|
| 69 |
// For each innovation after the first... |
|---|
| 70 |
for(j=1; j<Nv[1]; j++) { |
|---|
| 71 |
// For each time series... |
|---|
| 72 |
for(i=0; i<Nv[0]; i++) { |
|---|
| 73 |
// The drift plus the current innovation... |
|---|
| 74 |
sum = A1(i) + V2(i,j); |
|---|
| 75 |
// ...plus the dot product for the VAR(1) term... |
|---|
| 76 |
for(k=0; k<Nv[0]; k++) |
|---|
| 77 |
sum += B2(i,k) * Y2(k,j-1); |
|---|
| 78 |
// ...is the modeled output |
|---|
| 79 |
Y2(i,j) = sum; |
|---|
| 80 |
} |
|---|
| 81 |
} |
|---|
| 82 |
|
|---|
| 83 |
|
|---|
| 84 |
|
|---|
| 85 |
// Model.support |
|---|
| 86 |
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 87 |
|
|---|
| 88 |
|
|---|
| 89 |
// Model parameters |
|---|
| 90 |
struct parameters |
|---|
| 91 |
{ |
|---|
| 92 |
//--- Model parameters, direct --- |
|---|
| 93 |
PyArrayObject* d; // Multivariate log-volatility offset |
|---|
| 94 |
PyArrayObject* e; // VAR(1) coefficient, volatility shock to log-volatility |
|---|
| 95 |
PyArrayObject* g; // Correlation, multivariate normal z vs. multivariate |
|---|
| 96 |
// normal for innovation shocks |
|---|
| 97 |
|
|---|
| 98 |
//--- Model parameters, derivations --- |
|---|
| 99 |
PyArrayObject* rz; // Cross-correlation matrix, multivariate normal z to |
|---|
| 100 |
// volatility shock v |
|---|
| 101 |
PyArrayObject* ri; // Inverted cross-correlation matrix, innovation shocks |
|---|
| 102 |
PyArrayObject* sc; // Scaling constants for multivariate normal pdf, given g |
|---|
| 103 |
}; |
|---|
| 104 |
|
|---|
| 105 |
|
|---|
| 106 |
// An evaluation sample |
|---|
| 107 |
struct sample |
|---|
| 108 |
{ |
|---|
| 109 |
// Log-likelihood of the time-series sample in the current evaluation, given |
|---|
| 110 |
// h at this point |
|---|
| 111 |
double Lxk; |
|---|
| 112 |
// Log-likelihood of the innovations up to the current one, given the history |
|---|
| 113 |
// of h to this point |
|---|
| 114 |
double Lx; |
|---|
| 115 |
// Multivariate normal proposal, which is just z for the current evaluation, |
|---|
| 116 |
// and for all time-series samples after the first in each log-volatility |
|---|
| 117 |
// computation |
|---|
| 118 |
double *z; |
|---|
| 119 |
// Multivariate log-volatility value based on the current evaluation, or the |
|---|
| 120 |
// previous proposal to use this struct if the current proposal hasn't been |
|---|
| 121 |
// crunched yet |
|---|
| 122 |
double *h; |
|---|
| 123 |
// Scratchpad 1-D arrays of the same length as z, h |
|---|
| 124 |
double *x0, *x1; |
|---|
| 125 |
}; |
|---|
| 126 |
|
|---|
| 127 |
|
|---|
| 128 |
// Fast approximate exponent function EXP |
|---|
| 129 |
// |
|---|
| 130 |
// From N. Schraudolph, "A Fast, Compact Approximation of the Exponential |
|---|
| 131 |
// Function," Neural Computation 11, 853-862 (1999) |
|---|
| 132 |
static union { |
|---|
| 133 |
double d; |
|---|
| 134 |
struct { |
|---|
| 135 |
#ifdef LITTLE_ENDIAN |
|---|
| 136 |
int j, i; |
|---|
| 137 |
#else |
|---|
| 138 |
int i, j; |
|---|
| 139 |
#endif |
|---|
| 140 |
} n; |
|---|
| 141 |
} _eco; |
|---|
| 142 |
#define EXP_A (1048576/M_LN2) |
|---|
| 143 |
#define EXP_C 60801 |
|---|
| 144 |
|
|---|
| 145 |
#define EXP(y) (_eco.n.i = EXP_A*(y) + (1072693248 - EXP_C), _eco.d) |
|---|
| 146 |
|
|---|
| 147 |
|
|---|
| 148 |
// Uniformly distributed random variate in [a,b) |
|---|
| 149 |
double uniform(double a, double b) |
|---|
| 150 |
{ |
|---|
| 151 |
// Seed the PRNG on the first run only |
|---|
| 152 |
static int seeded = 0; |
|---|
| 153 |
if (!seeded) { |
|---|
| 154 |
int k; |
|---|
| 155 |
unsigned short seed[3]; |
|---|
| 156 |
long int timeval = time(0); |
|---|
| 157 |
for(k=0; k<3; k++) { |
|---|
| 158 |
seed[k] = (unsigned short) timeval; |
|---|
| 159 |
timeval = timeval >> 16; |
|---|
| 160 |
} |
|---|
| 161 |
seed48(seed); |
|---|
| 162 |
seeded = 1; |
|---|
| 163 |
} |
|---|
| 164 |
// Compute and return a variate from U(a,b) |
|---|
| 165 |
return (b - a) * drand48() + a; |
|---|
| 166 |
} |
|---|
| 167 |
|
|---|
| 168 |
|
|---|
| 169 |
// Log probability density of the unit normal distribution |
|---|
| 170 |
double normLogDensity(double x) |
|---|
| 171 |
{ |
|---|
| 172 |
static double logC = -log(2 * M_PI); |
|---|
| 173 |
return -0.5*x*x + logC; |
|---|
| 174 |
} |
|---|
| 175 |
|
|---|
| 176 |
|
|---|
| 177 |
// Random variate from a truncated normal distribution |
|---|
| 178 |
double truncnorm(double a, double b) |
|---|
| 179 |
{ |
|---|
| 180 |
int k; |
|---|
| 181 |
register double x; |
|---|
| 182 |
double c, cp; |
|---|
| 183 |
const double diff = b-a; |
|---|
| 184 |
// Compute the scale value c as the maximum possible pdf (regular normal |
|---|
| 185 |
// distribution) within the truncated range |
|---|
| 186 |
if(a < 0) { |
|---|
| 187 |
if(b > 0) { |
|---|
| 188 |
// Center is within the range, so use the maximum pdf at center |
|---|
| 189 |
c = 1.02; // Higher than 1.0 due to max EXP +error of 1.02 |
|---|
| 190 |
} else { |
|---|
| 191 |
// Range is below center, so use maximum pdf at its right edge |
|---|
| 192 |
c = 1.0625 * EXP(-0.5*b*b); // Scaled up by 1.02 / 0.96 |
|---|
| 193 |
} |
|---|
| 194 |
} else { |
|---|
| 195 |
// Range is above center, so use pdf at its left edge |
|---|
| 196 |
c = 1.0625 * EXP(-0.5*a*a); // Scaled up by 1.02 / 0.96 |
|---|
| 197 |
} |
|---|
| 198 |
// Accept-reject sampling for the truncated normal distribution |
|---|
| 199 |
do { |
|---|
| 200 |
// Generate a proposal within the truncated range |
|---|
| 201 |
x = a + diff*drand48(); |
|---|
| 202 |
// Compute the pdf of the proposal, using the regular normal distribution |
|---|
| 203 |
cp = EXP(-0.5*x*x); |
|---|
| 204 |
// Accept (and exit the loop) when the scaled uniform variate is less than |
|---|
| 205 |
// the proposal's pdf |
|---|
| 206 |
} while(c*drand48() > cp); |
|---|
| 207 |
return x; |
|---|
| 208 |
} |
|---|
| 209 |
|
|---|
| 210 |
|
|---|
| 211 |
// Matrix multiplication x*y -> z, where the square matrix 'x' is a |
|---|
| 212 |
// PyArrayObject and 'y' and 'z' are 1-D arrays. |
|---|
| 213 |
void matrixMultiply(PyArrayObject* x, double *y, double *z) |
|---|
| 214 |
{ |
|---|
| 215 |
int kr, km; |
|---|
| 216 |
register double sum; |
|---|
| 217 |
const int rows = (int) x->dimensions[0]; |
|---|
| 218 |
// Compute the dot product for each row of x |
|---|
| 219 |
for(kr=0; kr<rows; kr++) { |
|---|
| 220 |
// For this row of y and z... |
|---|
| 221 |
sum = 0; |
|---|
| 222 |
// Matrix multiplication dot product |
|---|
| 223 |
for(km=0; km<rows; km++) |
|---|
| 224 |
sum += PP2(x, kr, km) * PA1(y, km); |
|---|
| 225 |
PA1(z, kr) = sum; |
|---|
| 226 |
} |
|---|
| 227 |
} |
|---|
| 228 |
|
|---|
| 229 |
|
|---|
| 230 |
// Computes the log-volatility, given a proposal on z, the previously computed |
|---|
| 231 |
// log-volatility value previous to the sample, and the model parameters. |
|---|
| 232 |
void logVol(struct sample *S, struct parameters *P) |
|---|
| 233 |
{ |
|---|
| 234 |
int k; |
|---|
| 235 |
const int N = (int) P->d->dimensions[0]; |
|---|
| 236 |
|
|---|
| 237 |
// Run the VAR(1) process to get the current multivariate log-volatility |
|---|
| 238 |
// value |
|---|
| 239 |
|
|---|
| 240 |
// Start with the matrix product for the VAR(1) term... |
|---|
| 241 |
matrixMultiply(P->e, S->h, S->x0); |
|---|
| 242 |
// ...then compute the multivariate volatility shock given the proposed |
|---|
| 243 |
// normal variate... |
|---|
| 244 |
matrixMultiply(P->rz, S->z, S->x1); |
|---|
| 245 |
// ...then add them, plus the multivariate volatility offset, to be the new h |
|---|
| 246 |
for(k=0; k<N; k++) |
|---|
| 247 |
SPA1(S, h, k) = SPA1(S, x0, k) + SPA1(S, x1, k) + SPP1(P, d, k); |
|---|
| 248 |
} |
|---|
| 249 |
|
|---|
| 250 |
|
|---|
| 251 |
// Computes the log-likelihood of a multivariate innovation x given a 1-D array |
|---|
| 252 |
// containing a multivariate log-volatility. |
|---|
| 253 |
void logLikelihood(struct sample *S, struct parameters *P, double *x) |
|---|
| 254 |
{ |
|---|
| 255 |
register int k; |
|---|
| 256 |
double val; |
|---|
| 257 |
const int N = (int) P->g->dimensions[0]; |
|---|
| 258 |
|
|---|
| 259 |
// Inverse-scale the innovation by the square root of the volatilities in |
|---|
| 260 |
// preparation for decorrelation |
|---|
| 261 |
|
|---|
| 262 |
for(k=0; k<N; k++) |
|---|
| 263 |
// We could use a stripped-down version of exp here for speed; doing it |
|---|
| 264 |
// with the stdlib exp function takes about 70 CPU cycles (20 nS) on an |
|---|
| 265 |
// Intel QX9760 running at 3.8 GHz, though some of that is the unavoidable |
|---|
| 266 |
// array lookups and products in the equation. |
|---|
| 267 |
// |
|---|
| 268 |
SPA1(S, x0, k) = exp(-0.5 * SPA1(S, h, k)) * PA1(x, k); |
|---|
| 269 |
// Using EXP is very fast, but has error of about +/-6%. In a multivariate |
|---|
| 270 |
// test, the resulting error was -1112.29 vs an expected -1135.15. |
|---|
| 271 |
//SPA1(S, x0, k) = EXP(-0.5 * SPA1(S, h, k)) * PA1(x, k); |
|---|
| 272 |
|
|---|
| 273 |
// Now decorrelate the equi-variance innovations in preparation for the |
|---|
| 274 |
// log-likelihood computation for this multivariate log-volatility proposal |
|---|
| 275 |
matrixMultiply(P->ri, S->x0, S->x1); |
|---|
| 276 |
|
|---|
| 277 |
// Now compute log Pr(x[t]|h[t]), the log-likelihood of the decorrelated |
|---|
| 278 |
// multivariate innovation for this sample, conditional on the sample's |
|---|
| 279 |
// log-volatility. |
|---|
| 280 |
|
|---|
| 281 |
S->Lxk = 0; |
|---|
| 282 |
|
|---|
| 283 |
// For each time series... |
|---|
| 284 |
for(k=0; k<N; k++) { |
|---|
| 285 |
// Offset the decorrelated innovation by the mean, which is the correlation |
|---|
| 286 |
// between the normal variates for innovation and proposed volatility |
|---|
| 287 |
// shocks, times the value of the normal variate value underlying the |
|---|
| 288 |
// volatility shock for this sample |
|---|
| 289 |
SPA1(S, x0, k) = SPA1(S, x1, k) - SPP1(P, g, k) * SPA1(S, z, k); |
|---|
| 290 |
// The log-likelihood for this sample is simply the argument of the |
|---|
| 291 |
// exponential of the normal pdf, with the reciprocal scaling of the |
|---|
| 292 |
// exponential being done in log space by subtraction of the log of the |
|---|
| 293 |
// scaling coefficient |
|---|
| 294 |
val = SPP2(P, sc, k, 0) * SPA1(S, x0, k); |
|---|
| 295 |
// Fast squaring instead of pow() |
|---|
| 296 |
S->Lxk -= 0.5 * val*val + SPP2(P, sc, k, 1); |
|---|
| 297 |
// Since the innovation has been inverse-scaled by the square root of the |
|---|
| 298 |
// proposed volatility, the probability density needs to be scaled as |
|---|
| 299 |
// well. In log space, this is a subtraction of half the log-volatility. |
|---|
| 300 |
S->Lxk -= 0.5 * SPA1(S, h, k); |
|---|
| 301 |
} |
|---|
| 302 |
// Add the current log-likelihood to the accumulated log-likelihoods |
|---|
| 303 |
S->Lx += S->Lxk; |
|---|
| 304 |
} |
|---|
| 305 |
|
|---|
| 306 |
|
|---|
| 307 |
|
|---|
| 308 |
// Model.hybridGibbs |
|---|
| 309 |
// |
|---|
| 310 |
// Supplied variables |
|---|
| 311 |
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 312 |
|
|---|
| 313 |
//--- Supplied variables --- |
|---|
| 314 |
// z Independent normal variates, [pn] array (updated) |
|---|
| 315 |
// x Innovation values, [pn] array |
|---|
| 316 |
// w Wiggle value for +/- proposals (float) |
|---|
| 317 |
// ni Number of hybrid-Gibbs iterations (int) |
|---|
| 318 |
|
|---|
| 319 |
//--- Model parameters, direct --- |
|---|
| 320 |
// d Volatility offset, [p] vector |
|---|
| 321 |
// e Lag-1 cross-correlations for VAR of volatilities, [pp] array |
|---|
| 322 |
// g Volatility/innovation shock correlations, [p] vector |
|---|
| 323 |
|
|---|
| 324 |
//--- Model parameters, derivations --- |
|---|
| 325 |
// rz Concurrent xcorr, innovation-volatility normals, [pp] |
|---|
| 326 |
// ri Inverse concurrent xcorr, innovation shocks, [pp] |
|---|
| 327 |
// sc Constants for multivariate normal PDF |
|---|
| 328 |
|
|---|
| 329 |
|
|---|
| 330 |
// Run evaluations until odds of error in selection between current and |
|---|
| 331 |
// proposed z will be less than 1/100. |
|---|
| 332 |
#define MIN_DIFF 0.01 |
|---|
| 333 |
|
|---|
| 334 |
// The number of time series making up a single multivariate sample |
|---|
| 335 |
const int Nt = Nx[0]; |
|---|
| 336 |
// The number of multivariate samples |
|---|
| 337 |
const int Ns = Nx[1]; |
|---|
| 338 |
|
|---|
| 339 |
int ki, ke; |
|---|
| 340 |
int k0, k1, k2, k3; |
|---|
| 341 |
double val; |
|---|
| 342 |
|
|---|
| 343 |
// Multivariate innovation for one current time-series sample |
|---|
| 344 |
double *xk; |
|---|
| 345 |
// The multivariate proposal on z |
|---|
| 346 |
double zp[Nt]; |
|---|
| 347 |
// The multivariate value of h for current and proposal evaluations, at the |
|---|
| 348 |
// first time-series sample of the evaluation interval |
|---|
| 349 |
double he[2][Nt]; |
|---|
| 350 |
|
|---|
| 351 |
// A set of evaluation sample structs |
|---|
| 352 |
struct sample se[2]; |
|---|
| 353 |
// A struct for the model parameters |
|---|
| 354 |
struct parameters P; |
|---|
| 355 |
|
|---|
| 356 |
|
|---|
| 357 |
// Generate parameter struct |
|---|
| 358 |
P.d = d_array; P.e = e_array; P.g = g_array; |
|---|
| 359 |
P.rz = rz_array; P.ri = ri_array; P.sc = sc_array; |
|---|
| 360 |
|
|---|
| 361 |
// Initialize various arrays |
|---|
| 362 |
xk = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 363 |
for(k0=0; k0<2; k0++) { |
|---|
| 364 |
se[k0].z = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 365 |
se[k0].h = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 366 |
se[k0].x0 = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 367 |
se[k0].x1 = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 368 |
} |
|---|
| 369 |
|
|---|
| 370 |
// For each iteration... |
|---|
| 371 |
for(ki=0; ki<ni; ki++) { |
|---|
| 372 |
|
|---|
| 373 |
// The "previous" log-volatility of the first time-series sample is set to |
|---|
| 374 |
// the log-volatility offset plus a simulated, latent-parameter value. |
|---|
| 375 |
// TODO |
|---|
| 376 |
for(k0=0; k0<2; k0++) { |
|---|
| 377 |
for(k1=0; k1<Nt; k1++) |
|---|
| 378 |
PA1(se[k0].h, k1) = D1(k1); |
|---|
| 379 |
} |
|---|
| 380 |
|
|---|
| 381 |
// For each time-series sample... |
|---|
| 382 |
for(k0=0; k0<Ns; k0++) { |
|---|
| 383 |
|
|---|
| 384 |
// Simulate two sets of h samples from the current z and a proposal on z, |
|---|
| 385 |
// with a likelihood evaluation that starts from the current time-series |
|---|
| 386 |
// sample to some subsequent time-series sample at which the log-likelihood |
|---|
| 387 |
// of the innovation for that sample becomes substantially the same for the |
|---|
| 388 |
// current and proposal value of z. |
|---|
| 389 |
|
|---|
| 390 |
k1 = k0; |
|---|
| 391 |
|
|---|
| 392 |
// Clear the log-likelihood and normal log-density accumulators of each |
|---|
| 393 |
// evaluation struct for the next pair of evaluations. |
|---|
| 394 |
for(k2=0; k2<2; k2++) |
|---|
| 395 |
se[k2].Lx = 0; |
|---|
| 396 |
|
|---|
| 397 |
do { |
|---|
| 398 |
|
|---|
| 399 |
// Prepare current-innovation vector xk |
|---|
| 400 |
for(k2=0; k2<Nt; k2++) |
|---|
| 401 |
PA1(xk, k2) = X2(k2, k1); |
|---|
| 402 |
|
|---|
| 403 |
// For each evaluation... |
|---|
| 404 |
for(k2=0; k2<2; k2++) { |
|---|
| 405 |
|
|---|
| 406 |
// Set z... |
|---|
| 407 |
for(k3=0; k3<Nt; k3++) { |
|---|
| 408 |
val = Z2(k3, k1); |
|---|
| 409 |
if(k1==k0) { |
|---|
| 410 |
if(k2==1) { |
|---|
| 411 |
// First time-series sample for the second evaluation, use a |
|---|
| 412 |
// proposal on z instead of z itself |
|---|
| 413 |
val = truncnorm(val-w, val+w); |
|---|
| 414 |
zp[k3] = val; |
|---|
| 415 |
} |
|---|
| 416 |
} |
|---|
| 417 |
PA1(se[k2].z, k3) = val; |
|---|
| 418 |
} |
|---|
| 419 |
// ...compute the multivariate log-volatility |
|---|
| 420 |
logVol(&se[k2], &P); |
|---|
| 421 |
// ...and the log-likelihood of the innovation for this time-series |
|---|
| 422 |
// sample, given the log-volatility |
|---|
| 423 |
logLikelihood(&se[k2], &P, xk); |
|---|
| 424 |
|
|---|
| 425 |
// Save the first log-volatility |
|---|
| 426 |
if(k1==k0) { |
|---|
| 427 |
for(k3=0; k3<Nt; k3++) |
|---|
| 428 |
he[k2][k3] = PA1(se[k2].h, k3); |
|---|
| 429 |
} |
|---|
| 430 |
} |
|---|
| 431 |
|
|---|
| 432 |
// Ready for the next time series sample, assuming there is one |
|---|
| 433 |
k1++; |
|---|
| 434 |
|
|---|
| 435 |
// Continue only if difference in log-likelihood of the current |
|---|
| 436 |
// time-series sample of the evaluations between current and proposed z |
|---|
| 437 |
// is great enough to warrant doing so. |
|---|
| 438 |
val = se[0].Lxk - se[1].Lxk; |
|---|
| 439 |
|
|---|
| 440 |
} while (k1<Ns && (val > MIN_DIFF || val < -MIN_DIFF)); |
|---|
| 441 |
|
|---|
| 442 |
// Metropolis-hastings selection of current or proposal |
|---|
| 443 |
val = se[1].Lx - se[0].Lx; |
|---|
| 444 |
if(val > 0 || log(uniform(0, 1)) < val) { |
|---|
| 445 |
// Proposal accepted |
|---|
| 446 |
ke = 1; |
|---|
| 447 |
for(k2=0; k2<Nt; k2++) |
|---|
| 448 |
Z2(k2, k0) = zp[k2]; |
|---|
| 449 |
} else { |
|---|
| 450 |
// Proposal rejected |
|---|
| 451 |
ke = 0; |
|---|
| 452 |
} |
|---|
| 453 |
|
|---|
| 454 |
// Set the initial log-volatility of the evaluations for the next |
|---|
| 455 |
// time-series sample to the log-volatility of the selected evaluation for |
|---|
| 456 |
// this time-series sample. |
|---|
| 457 |
for(k2=0; k2<Nt; k2++) { |
|---|
| 458 |
val = he[ke][k2]; |
|---|
| 459 |
for(k3=0; k3<2; k3++) |
|---|
| 460 |
PA1(se[k3].h, k2) = val; |
|---|
| 461 |
} |
|---|
| 462 |
|
|---|
| 463 |
// Done with log-volatility draw for this time-series sample |
|---|
| 464 |
} |
|---|
| 465 |
|
|---|
| 466 |
// Done with iterations |
|---|
| 467 |
} |
|---|
| 468 |
|
|---|
| 469 |
// Free array memory |
|---|
| 470 |
free(xk); |
|---|
| 471 |
for(k0=0; k0<2; k0++) { |
|---|
| 472 |
free(se[k0].z); |
|---|
| 473 |
free(se[k0].h); |
|---|
| 474 |
free(se[k0].x0); |
|---|
| 475 |
free(se[k0].x1); |
|---|
| 476 |
} |
|---|
| 477 |
|
|---|
| 478 |
|
|---|
| 479 |
|
|---|
| 480 |
// Model.likelihood |
|---|
| 481 |
// |
|---|
| 482 |
// Supplied variables |
|---|
| 483 |
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|
| 484 |
|
|---|
| 485 |
//--- Supplied variables --- |
|---|
| 486 |
// z Independent normal variates, m previously simulated sets, [mpn] array |
|---|
| 487 |
// x Innovation values, [pn] array |
|---|
| 488 |
|
|---|
| 489 |
//--- Model parameters, direct --- |
|---|
| 490 |
// d Volatility offset, [p] vector |
|---|
| 491 |
// e Lag-1 cross-correlations for VAR of volatilities, [pp] array |
|---|
| 492 |
// g Volatility/innovation shock correlations, [p] vector |
|---|
| 493 |
|
|---|
| 494 |
//--- Model parameters, derivations --- |
|---|
| 495 |
// rz Concurrent xcorr, innovation-volatility normals, [pp] |
|---|
| 496 |
// ri Inverse concurrent xcorr, innovation shocks, [pp] |
|---|
| 497 |
// sc Constants for multivariate normal PDF |
|---|
| 498 |
|
|---|
| 499 |
//--- Return value (double float) --- |
|---|
| 500 |
// The linear likelihood P(x|w) of the innovations given the parameters, |
|---|
| 501 |
// integrated over the log-volatility simulations along the first axis of z |
|---|
| 502 |
|
|---|
| 503 |
|
|---|
| 504 |
// The number of time series making up a single multivariate sample |
|---|
| 505 |
const int Nt = Nx[0]; |
|---|
| 506 |
// The number of multivariate samples |
|---|
| 507 |
const int Ns = Nx[1]; |
|---|
| 508 |
|
|---|
| 509 |
int ki; |
|---|
| 510 |
int k0, k1; |
|---|
| 511 |
double val, maxVal; |
|---|
| 512 |
|
|---|
| 513 |
// Multivariate innovation for one current time-series sample |
|---|
| 514 |
double *xk; |
|---|
| 515 |
// Log-likelihood of the innovation for the time-series sample in the current |
|---|
| 516 |
// evalution, accumulated for each iteration |
|---|
| 517 |
double Lx[Nz[0]]; |
|---|
| 518 |
|
|---|
| 519 |
// A single evaluation sample struct |
|---|
| 520 |
struct sample se; |
|---|
| 521 |
// A struct for the model parameters |
|---|
| 522 |
struct parameters P; |
|---|
| 523 |
|
|---|
| 524 |
|
|---|
| 525 |
// Generate parameter struct |
|---|
| 526 |
P.d = d_array; P.e = e_array; P.g = g_array; |
|---|
| 527 |
P.rz = rz_array; P.ri = ri_array; P.sc = sc_array; |
|---|
| 528 |
|
|---|
| 529 |
// Initialize various arrays |
|---|
| 530 |
xk = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 531 |
se.z = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 532 |
se.h = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 533 |
se.x0 = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 534 |
se.x1 = (double *) malloc(sizeof(double) * Nt); |
|---|
| 535 |
|
|---|
| 536 |
|
|---|
| 537 |
// Iterate over each set of simulated z values... |
|---|
| 538 |
for(ki=0; ki<Nz[0]; ki++) { |
|---|
| 539 |
|
|---|
| 540 |
// Initialize this iteration's accumulator |
|---|
| 541 |
Lx[ki] = 0; |
|---|
| 542 |
|
|---|
| 543 |
// The "previous" log-volatility of the first time-series sample is set to |
|---|
| 544 |
// the log-volatility offset plus a simulated, latent-parameter value. |
|---|
| 545 |
// TODO |
|---|
| 546 |
for(k1=0; k1<Nt; k1++) |
|---|
| 547 |
PA1(se.h, k1) = D1(k1); |
|---|
| 548 |
|
|---|
| 549 |
// For each time-series sample... |
|---|
| 550 |
for(k0=0; k0<Ns; k0++) { |
|---|
| 551 |
|
|---|
| 552 |
// For each time series... |
|---|
| 553 |
for(k1=0; k1<Nt; k1++) { |
|---|
| 554 |
// Prepare current-innovation vector xk... |
|---|
| 555 |
PA1(xk, k1) = X2(k1, k0); |
|---|
| 556 |
// ...and set z |
|---|
| 557 |
PA1(se.z, k1) = Z3(ki, k1, k0); |
|---|
| 558 |
} |
|---|
| 559 |
|
|---|
| 560 |
// Compute the multivariate log-volatility... |
|---|
| 561 |
logVol(&se, &P); |
|---|
| 562 |
// ...and the log-likelihood of the innovation for this time-series |
|---|
| 563 |
// sample, given the log-volatility |
|---|
| 564 |
logLikelihood(&se, &P, xk); |
|---|
| 565 |
// Accumulate the log-likelihood |
|---|
| 566 |
Lx[ki] += se.Lxk; |
|---|
| 567 |
|
|---|
| 568 |
// Done with log-likelihood evaluation for this time-series sample |
|---|
| 569 |
} |
|---|
| 570 |
|
|---|
| 571 |
// Done with iterations |
|---|
| 572 |
} |
|---|
| 573 |
|
|---|
| 574 |
// Free array memory |
|---|
| 575 |
free(xk); |
|---|
| 576 |
free(se.z); |
|---|
| 577 |
free(se.h); |
|---|
| 578 |
free(se.x0); |
|---|
| 579 |
free(se.x1); |
|---|
| 580 |
|
|---|
| 581 |
|
|---|
| 582 |
// Compute the result, the integrated P(x|w) over all the sets of simulated z |
|---|
| 583 |
// values |
|---|
| 584 |
|
|---|
| 585 |
// Compute the maximum log density and save it to subtract from everybody so |
|---|
| 586 |
// that the maximum log density is normalized to zero |
|---|
| 587 |
maxVal = -HUGE_VAL; |
|---|
| 588 |
for(ki=0; ki<Nz[0]; ki++) { |
|---|
| 589 |
if(Lx[ki] > maxVal) |
|---|
| 590 |
maxVal = Lx[ki]; |
|---|
| 591 |
} |
|---|
| 592 |
// Accumulate the linearized normalized densities |
|---|
| 593 |
val = 0; |
|---|
| 594 |
for(ki=0; ki<Nz[0]; ki++) |
|---|
| 595 |
val += exp(Lx[ki] - maxVal); |
|---|
| 596 |
// ...and return the denormalized, log mean of the linear densities... |
|---|
| 597 |
return_val = log(val) + maxVal - log(Nz[0]); |
|---|